I remain intrigued by discussions I often hear in real estate where low offers are called "insulting" or other names and descriptions (such as "low ball", "useless", "waste of time", and "disrespectful").
This is usually followed by a discussion of how any "serious" offer on a home should be within 5% to 8% of the list price. Huh? Where do professionals get the nerve to disparage a business offer?
I can understand how a home buyer or seller can see things as personal, especially if the house has been their home for years. What I find particularly interesting is why so-called "real estate professionals" play this ridicule game instead of honestly advising their clients on the current market, value issues, and the business side of the house sale/purchase.
Are there any other business markets/industries where low offers are commonly and publicly ridiculed?
In my years of running businesses, we make offers on projects and we help other companies with products and service they buy and sell. Pricing that is too high or too low may remove a company from consideration, but the effort to propose and consider doing business IS APPRECIATED... not ridiculed.
At the same time, I rarely fail to hear these same "real estate pros" make the same "insulting" comments about houses that are listed at 40% to 80% of the price the house sold for in the last 8 years. Come on... how can it be insulting one direction and not the other?
Where is it written that a seller can jack up a price by huge amounts as "acceptable" but offers that are not close to this new price are "insulting?"
Here are some of my theories of why some of the "pros" play this game of labeling low offers as "insulting" and making business deals suddenly very personal:
* Suggesting that a low price could be "insulting" plays well to many uneducated clients. This is a pure manipulation ploy.
* Suggesting that a low price could be "insulting" discourages written offers that are less likely to be accepted, thus saving the agent time. This is independent of the reality that some low offers are accepted or are at least a start of negotiations.
* Many people, including Realtors, are still uncomfortable talking about money and, deep down, just want to follow a pre-determined recipe instead of possibly challenging negotiations. The recipe they prefer works something like this: List Price... Offer of 8% off List... Counter of 4% off List.... Sale of 6% off List. Everyone plays the dance even though it was all based on the list price, not the value. Anything else is "uncharted" territory and confuses the recipe-followers.
* They heard others discuss low offers as "insulting" and are just repeating the concept without much thought or concern. "I heard it in the office, it must be true."
* A buyer's agent learns this is a great "tactic" (dare I say, "trick") to sell their clients a house that may be overpriced (instead of advising on why the house may be overpriced). These agents are more worried about getting a commission on a fast sale than helping the client get an appropriate deal.
* It may be the listing agent, not the homeowner, that sees the offers as an insult. They either suggested the current list price or failed to put forth the effort to properly advise their client. Now the low offers "suggest" they did not do their job and to save face, they disparage the offer. They may have even priced price appropriately but privately fear the homeowner will think the buyer's agent is smarter or market savvy.
* The buyer's agent honestly believes all list prices represent current house value. "So what's left to negotiate? Don't waste my time." they think.
* Many agents passed the licensing exams and have sales training but they are not skilled negotiators. So, they use name-calling as way to try to avoid negotiations that could be challenging or time-consuming (even if it can result in a purchase).
* In many business-to-business deals, ridiculing offers or services can come back to haunt a business as this behavior establishes how professional they treat others including those that are not vendors or clients. The client or vendor you did not make a deal with today may be still be a client or vendor in five years. So, I wonder if few agents expect to never work with the other party on the deal, thus they are free to ridicule the offer or the price openly.
I want to be clear that I am not clueless... there are buyers that just don't understand the market or have some idea that they can buy EVERY property for pennies on the dollar.
At the same time, that does not mean that the low offer they submit may not be accepted (more work perhaps but who said ever client and every deal is easy). Or that the low offer is in any way personal. An insult is only an insult if it is personal. The buyers usually don't know the listing agent or the homeowners, so it can't be personal. It is free market.
Owners may list as they see the value (right or wrong). Buyers may offer what they see is the value. It can be accepted, rejected or countered. Injecting phrases such as "insulting" takes a business deal and makes it personal. Once it is personal, all further negotiations are much more challenged.
Isn't our goal to make deals happen, not make deals harder?
